Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Felten

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1980No. 11087Published

1Opinion of the Court

612 P.2d 216 (1980)

Martin ANDERSON, Appellant,

v.

Eugene FELTEN, Harold Felten and Norma C. Felten, Respondents.

No. 11087.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

June 4, 1980.

Guild, Hagen & Clark, Ltd., and Thomas J. Hall, Reno, for appellant.

Hale, Lane, Peek, Dennison & Howard, and Gregg W. Zive, Reno, for respondents.

OPINION

THOMPSON, Justice:

This action was commenced by Anderson seeking a court declaration that he is the owner of a 50-foot easement over the property of the Feltens, and that the Feltens be enjoined from obstructing such easement. It was his contention that the easement had been acquired by…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Hamerly v. DentonAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Central Pacific Railway Co. v. Alameda CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Cox v. Glenbrook CompanyNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Howard v. WrightNevada Supreme Court · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API