Legal Opinion

Wilfon v. Cyril Hampel 1985 Trust

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1989No. 19371PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*608OPINION

2Per curiam

This is a prescriptive easement case. The trial court recognized respondent Cyril Hampel’s right of prescription over two portions of George Wilfon’s land. Hampel operates a trailer park adjacent to the Wilfon property and claimed the right to use as a driveway a small horseshoe-shaped portion of a corner of the Wilfon property. Hampel also claimed a prescriptive right to use a dirt road that crossed Wilfon’s property. With respect to these portions of Wilfon’s property, there is evidence that the trailer park tenants crossed over the corner of Wilfon’s property for a number of years…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Howard v. WrightNevada Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Garmond v. KinneyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Chollar-Potosi Mining Co. v. KennedyNevada Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Gerberding v. SchnakenbergNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Stix v. La RueNevada Supreme Court · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jordan v. BaileyNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Michelsen v. HarveyNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Dewey Beach Lions Club, Inc. v. LonganeckerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2006
  4. Colfer v. HarmonNevada Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API