Wilfon v. Cyril Hampel 1985 Trust
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*608OPINION
2Per curiam
This is a prescriptive easement case. The trial court recognized respondent Cyril Hampel’s right of prescription over two portions of George Wilfon’s land. Hampel operates a trailer park adjacent to the Wilfon property and claimed the right to use as a driveway a small horseshoe-shaped portion of a corner of the Wilfon property. Hampel also claimed a prescriptive right to use a dirt road that crossed Wilfon’s property. With respect to these portions of Wilfon’s property, there is evidence that the trailer park tenants crossed over the corner of Wilfon’s property for a number of years…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Howard v. WrightNevada Supreme Court · 1914
- Garmond v. KinneyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- Chollar-Potosi Mining Co. v. KennedyNevada Supreme Court · 1867
- Gerberding v. SchnakenbergNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
- Stix v. La RueNevada Supreme Court · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Jordan v. BaileyNevada Supreme Court · 1997
- Michelsen v. HarveyNevada Supreme Court · 1991
- Dewey Beach Lions Club, Inc. v. LonganeckerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2006
- Colfer v. HarmonNevada Supreme Court · 1992