Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Felten

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1980No. 11087PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*538OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, J.:

This action was commenced by Anderson seeking a court declaration that he is the owner of a 50-foot easement over the property of the Feltens, and that the Feltens be enjoined from obstructing such easement. It was his contention that the easement had been acquired by prescription and by implied public dedication. The district court found that an easement had not been acquired. This appeal followed.

This litigation concerns an area in Douglas County, Nevada, known as Mott Canyon.

The Feltens own two contiguous parcels depicted on the map as Felten A and B.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Hamerly v. DentonAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Howard v. WrightNevada Supreme Court · 1914
  4. City of Northglenn v. City of ThorntonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  5. Stix v. La RueNevada Supreme Court · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Venetian Casino Resort, L.L.C. v. Local Joint Executive Board Of Las VegasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Wilfon v. Cyril Hampel 1985 TrustNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Wagon Wheel Landowners Ass'n v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1992
  4. Anderson v. FeltenNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Crowder Farms, LLC v. Jeff L. FlickIndiana Court of Appeals · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API