Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Brennan

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1976No. 7966PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Batjer, J.:

Appellant commenced an action against respondents seeking to quiet title to a claimed driveway easement over respondents’ property and to permanently enjoin respondents from interfering with her use of such easement. At trial, after the close of appellant’s case, the district court granted respondents’ NRCP 41(b) motion to dismiss. This appeal followed.

The complaint alleged an easement by express grant, implication or prescription. On a motion for involuntary dismissal under NRCP 41(b) plaintiff’s evidence and all reasonable inferences must be accepted by the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Di Leo v. Pecksto Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Feldman Et Ux. v. Knapp Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Howard v. WrightNevada Supreme Court · 1914
  4. LeDeit v. EhlertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Bearden v. City of Boulder CityNevada Supreme Court · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McGill v. WahlAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Dault v. ShawAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Zachary v. State ex rel. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
  4. Jackson v. HicksNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Dean v. PollardNevada Supreme Court · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API