Legal Opinion

Melendez v. Hintz

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided July 31, 1986No. 15826PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Justice.

Michael and Kathryn Melendez brought this action against their neighbor James Hintz after Hintz blocked a driveway on his property which the Melendezes or their predecessors had used for twenty years. The Melendezes claimed they had acquired a prescriptive easement by adverse use of the driveway. The district court agreed. Hintz has appealed. Upon a record of undisputed facts we are asked to decide whether, as a matter of law, the Melendezes’ use of the driveway was adverse to Hintz or permissive. Holding that the use was adverse, we affirm.

The properties involved are shown…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Feldman Et Ux. v. Knapp Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. West v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Sinnett v. WerelusIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Gibbens v. WeisshauptIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Zollinger v. FrankUtah Supreme Court · 1946

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hodgins v. SalesIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Roberts v. SwimIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Martel v. BulottiIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Burns v. AldermanIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Chen v. ConwayIdaho Supreme Court · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API