Legal Opinion

El Dorado Irrigation District v. Browne

California Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1932No. Docket No. S.F. 14431PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is a petition by El Dorado Irrigation District for a writ of mandate to compel respondent, its treasurer, to pay a warrant drawn upon the construction fund of the district. Upon the hearing in this matter an order of reference was made and findings of fact were prepared by the referee, Hon. Peter J. Shields, Judge of the superior court. From these findings, the essential undisputed facts appear as follows: Pursuant to section 30 of the California Irrigation Act (2 Deering’s Gen. Laws, 1931, p. 1948, Act 3854), the district employed S. J. Norris, an engineer, to prepare plans…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Board of Directors of Modesto Irrigation District v. TregeaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. O'Farrell v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Williams v. City of StocktonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Cullen v. Glendora Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hershey v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Eastern Municipal Water District v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. East Bay Municipal Utility District v. SindelarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. County of San Diego v. PerrigoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API