Rauer's Law & Collection Co. v. Berthiaume
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. H. D. Burroughs, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from a judgment and from an order denying a new trial upon the judgment-roll and a statement of the case.
The defendants in this action are husband and wife. Plaintiff's first cause of action is founded upon the allegation that the defendants became indebted to the firm of Stone Smith for services rendered at their special instance and request of the value of $595.
Plaintiff's second cause of action alleged the indebtedness of the defendants to Carmichael, Bray Co., a corporation, in the sum of $139.50 for goods sold and delivered to the defendants at their special instance…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Tillaux v. TillauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Alferitz v. ArrivillagaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Burkett v. BurkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Hamilton v. HubbardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Puget Sound Lumber Co. v. KrugCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- McDonough v. GoodcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Hulsman v. IrelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Brown v. OxtobyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Stegeman v. VandeventerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- California Savings & Commercial Bank v. CanneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.