Legal Opinion

Brown v. Oxtoby

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 2, 1941No. Civ. 6595PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTuttle, J.

This is an action for damages, based upon false representations. Findings were entered in favor of plaintiff, and judgment was entered against defendants in the sum of $14,258.33.

As grounds for reversal, appellants and defendants, urge the following points: That the evidence is insufficient to support the findings, and that the court erred in failing to find upon a set-off in favor of appellants, which it is claimed was proven. The court found:

“That it is true that to induce plaintiff to enter into said agreement and to lend and pay defendants said sum of ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00),…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Spreckels v. GorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. French v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Tarke v. BinghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Teague v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Hulsman v. IrelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Lovetro v. SteersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Walsh v. Hooker & FayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API