Legal Opinion
Stegeman v. Vandeventer
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 23, 1943No. Civ. 3028PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $1,475, and refusing judgment against Cora M. Vandeventer and rescission of a contract.
Defendant V. W. Vandeventer was a duly licensed real estate broker. Cora M. Yandeventer was his wife. They owned their home in Bakersfield. There was an unpaid principal balance of $1,650 of a debt due plaintiff by both defendants secured by a deed of trust on this property.
Early in 1939, plaintiff and Yandeventer entered into an agreement whereby plaintiff paid Yandeventer $750 which the latter was to use in securing oil leases in New…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cal. Farm & Fruit Co. v. Schiappa-PietraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- More v. MoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Tedford v. Los Angeles Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Puget Sound Lumber Co. v. KrugCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Schader v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lovetro v. SteersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Resure, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- B. F. Goodrich Co. v. NaplesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954
- Engle v. FarrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Harrah v. Specialty Shops, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.