Hulsman v. Ireland
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
This appeal presents a question respecting community property rights between a husband and wife and third persons. Appellants argue strenuously for their position, but admit their inability to find authority to support it. Respondent, of course, does not aid them in this difficulty, but contends that the appeal must be dismissed “without hesitation. ’ ’ However, notwithstanding this situation, we are of the opinion that appellants are correct in the contention put forth,, for which we have found a measure of authority.
Plaintiffs, as a copartnership, sue defendants individually and as…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Puget Sound Lumber Co. v. KrugCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Schader v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Arnold v. LoomisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Karns v. OlneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Wetzel v. L. Simon & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1894
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Patterson v. Domino's Pizza, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Nichols v. Arthur Murray, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Gardiner v. GaitherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Nels E. Nelson, Inc. v. TarmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.