Hamilton v. Hubbard
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Upon a careful reconsideration of this case we are convinced that there is no substantial conflict in the evidence, and that there is nothing to support the findings of the superior court to the effect that the lot in controversy, upon its conveyance to Mrs. Hamilton, became community property. The Department opinion will therefore stand.
The point is made in the petition for rehearing that the plaintiff's demand is stale. This position cannot be sustained. The complaint, on its face, does not show a stale demand, and there is nothing in the findings or conclusions of the superior court to…
2Cited by31 opinions
- Oyama v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Fanning v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Title Ins. and Trust Co. v. IngersollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Lezinsky v. Mason Malt Whiskey Distilling Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Clary v. FlemingMontana Supreme Court · 1921
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.