Legal Opinion
Stagg v. Vintage Place Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 20, 2011No. A09-949PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
On January 29, 2009, respondent Ronald Stagg was discharged from employment by respondent Vintage Place Inc. (Vintage Place) for excessive absenteeism and tardiness. Stagg applied for unemployment benefits. An unemployment law judge (ULJ) determined that Stagg was ineligible for unemployment benefits because he was discharged for employment misconduct as defined by Minn.Stat. § 268.095, subd. 6(a) (2010). The court of appeals reversed, holding that because Vintage Place failed to follow its progressive discipline policy when it terminated Stagg, the termination was not…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Feges v. Perkins Restaurants, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Ress v. Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Schmidgall v. FilmTec Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Colburn v. Pine Portage Madden Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Markel v. City of Circle PinesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Icenhower v. Total Automotive, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Nina Wilson v. Mortgage Resource Center, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Cunningham v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Van de Werken v. Bell & Howell, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Hasledalen v. Department of Employment & Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.