Schmidgall v. FilmTec Corp.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RUSSELL A. ANDERSON, Justice.
Wanda J. Schmidgall was discharged from employment with FilmTec Corporation for violating FilmTec’s same-shift injury reporting policy. She was denied unemployment benefits by the Commissioner, Department of Economic Security, because she was discharged for employment misconduct. The court of appeals affirmed. Because we conclude under the facts of this case that Schmidgall’s conduct constituted employment misconduct, we affirm.
I
FilmTec is a manufacturing company that produces a thin film composite membrane or “element” used in water purification systems.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Tilseth v. Midwest Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Ress v. Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Colburn v. Pine Portage Madden Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Auger v. Gillette Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- McGowan v. Executive Express Transportation Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Skarhus v. Davanni's Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Stagg v. Vintage Place Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Jenkins v. American Express Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Icenhower v. Total Automotive, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Peterson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.