Legal Opinion
Icenhower v. Total Automotive, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 28, 2014No. A13-1287PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHELLHAS, Judge.
Relator challenges an unemployment-law judge’s (ULJ) decisions not to grant *851relator’s request for the issuance of subpoenas and that relator is ineligible for unemployment benefits due to employment misconduct. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondent Total Automotive Inc. employed relator Aireal Ieenhower as a sales representative for about one year. On January 11, 2013, Ieenhower told her supervisor, C.M., that 22 of her Ritalin pills, prescribed for her attention-deficit disorder (ADD), were missing from her purse. C.M. contacted the police to report the theft. Subsequently, both…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Skarhus v. Davanni's Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Schmidgall v. FilmTec Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Stagg v. Vintage Place Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Nina Wilson v. Mortgage Resource Center, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Jennifer White, Relator v. University of Minnesota Physicians Corp., Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- Ayode A. Ogunkola, Relator v. Cirrus Design Corporation, Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- Jason Brennan, Relator v. Lubrication Technologies, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- Lucille O'Quinn, Relator v. Noodles & Company (Corp.), Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.