Legal Opinion
Van de Werken v. Bell & Howell, LLC
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 15, 2013No. A12-2194PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIS, Judge.*
Relator challenges an unemployment-law judge’s application of severance-pay ineligibility to the period immediately, following his last day of employment, resulting in a finding of an overpayment of *221unemployment benefits. Because the unemployment-law judge erred by concluding that relator was ineligible to receive unemployment benefits during a time that he did not receive severance pay, we reverse and remand for a recomputation of relator’s unemployment benefits.
FACTS
Relator Diederick van de Werken separated from his employment with respondent Bell & Howell on May 21,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Ress v. Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Skarhus v. Davanni's Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Stagg v. Vintage Place Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Icenhower v. Total Automotive, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Clifford G. Menyweather, Relator v. Fedtech, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- Andrew R. Patson, Relator v. Skaff Apartments, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Dean M. Haupt, Relator v. Menard, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- Murray Gushulak, Relator v. Boise Paper Holdings, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015