Legal Opinion
Nina Wilson v. Mortgage Resource Center, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 28, 2016No. A15-0435PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILDEA, Chief Justice.
In this case, we are asked to decide what qualifies as “employment misconduct” under the Minnesota Unemployment Insurance Law. Minn. Stat. ch. 268 (2014). Concluding that respondent Nina Wilson was discharged for “employment misconduct” under Minn. Stat. § 268.095, subd. 4 (2016), an Unemployment Law Judge (ULJ) determined that she was ineligible for unemployment benefits. The court of appeals reversed, applying its own precedent to conclude that Wilson’s conduct did not constitute employment misconduct. Wilson v. Mortg. Res. Ctr., Inc., No. A15-0435, 2015 WL…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Tilseth v. Midwest Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Beck v. GroeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Skarhus v. Davanni's Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Application of MinnegascoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Friedlander v. Edwards Lifesciences, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Diaz v. Three Rivers Cmty. Action, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
- Harstad v. City of WoodburyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Svihel Vegetable Farm, Inc. v. Dep't of Emp't & Econ. Dev.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
- Appeal of KrenikSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.