State of Minnesota v. David Lee Haywood
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUDSON, Justice.
This case presents the question of whether an air-powered BB gun is a “firearm” under the felon-in-possession statute, Minn.Stat. § 609.165 (2014). The State charged appellant David Haywood with one count of Possession of a Firearm by an Ineligible Person under Minn.Stat. § 609.165, subd. lb. Haywood filed two motions to dismiss. In the first motion, Haywood argued that the charge should be dismissed because the BB gun that police found in his possession was not a “firearm” within the meaning of Minn.Stat. § 609.165. In his second, alternative motion, Haywood challenged…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. RickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. LeathersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. WestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- A.A.A. v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Jacky L. Larson v. The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, CMInformation Specialists, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- LaPenotiere v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- State v. IvyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- State v. ProvostCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- In reSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- State v. JamaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.