Legal Opinion

State of Minnesota v. David Lee Haywood

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 19, 2016No. A14-1792PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUDSON, Justice.

This case presents the question of whether an air-powered BB gun is a “firearm” under the felon-in-possession statute, Minn.Stat. § 609.165 (2014). The State charged appellant David Haywood with one count of Possession of a Firearm by an Ineligible Person under Minn.Stat. § 609.165, subd. lb. Haywood filed two motions to dismiss. In the first motion, Haywood argued that the charge should be dismissed because the BB gun that police found in his possession was not a “firearm” within the meaning of Minn.Stat. § 609.165. In his second, alternative motion, Haywood challenged…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. RickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  2. State v. LeathersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  3. State v. WestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. A.A.A. v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  5. Jacky L. Larson v. The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, CMInformation Specialists, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. LaPenotiere v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  2. State v. IvyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  3. State v. ProvostCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  4. In reSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  5. State v. JamaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API