Legal Opinion
In re
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 16, 2018No. A17-1194PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LILLEHAUG, Justice.
*824In April 2016, Clay County Social Services filed petitions to terminate the parental rights of S.R.K. and O.A.K. Following a trial governed by the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) and the Minnesota Indian Family Preservation Act (MIFPA), the district court terminated parental rights. We granted review to determine what evidence is required by ICWA and MIFPA for a district court to terminate parental rights, and whether the district court properly determined that the evidence was sufficient here. Because ICWA and MIFPA require qualified expert witness testimony to support the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Adoptive Couple v. Baby GirlSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Larson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Marcia v. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Mahowald v. Minnesota Gas Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- San Diego Cnty. Health & Human Servs. Agency v. H.S. (In re Collin E.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- In re Collin E.California Court of Appeal · 2018