Legal Opinion
State v. Ivy
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 25, 2017No. A16-1339PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FLOREY, Judge
On appeal from his convictions of ten counts that included sex-trafficking, criminal sexual conduct, and solicitation to practice prostitution, appellant argues that (1) the district court erred by denying his motion to sever under Minn. R. Crim. P. 17.03, subd. 3; (2) the district court committed prejudicial plain error by not sua sponte giving an accomplice-liability jury instruction pertaining to Count 10 of the complaint; (3) there was insufficient evidence to sustain his conviction of Count 5 of the complaint; (4) the prosecutor committed prejudicial misconduct during…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. RameySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Bernhardt v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- A23-1099 Rashad Ramon Ivy v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- Ivy v. BolinDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2025
- Rashad Ramon Ivy v. William Bolin; Margit Heald; Christian Dobratz; Rick Raven; Daniel Moe; Corey Anderson-Moe; Jenny Carufel; Jeff White; Bronson Austregn; Eric Nelson; Kelly McElroy; Danielle Reed; Amanda Hofer; Chad Oye; and Kate RudesillDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2026