Legal Opinion
State v. Provost
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 14, 2017No. A17-0130PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
■HOOTEN, Judge
Appellant argues that’the district court abused its discretion by denying his motion to correct his sentence, which was based on an incorrect criminal history score. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
In February 2015, appellant Shawn Michael Provost was . charged in Meeker County with second-degree burglary, along with three, other crimes. Provost pleaded guilty to the burglary charge, and . the state agreed to dismiss the other three *201charges. The plea did not include an agreement as to his sentence. The district court sentenced Provost to 48 months, which was the presumptive…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Molina-Martinez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- State v. MaurstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State of Minnesota v. David Lee HaywoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- State v. StutelbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. DeZelerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. OreskovichCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
- State of Minnesota v. Antonio Devell JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2026
- State of Minnesota v. Walter Pierre ThomasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024