Legal Opinion

LaPenotiere v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 1, 2018No. A17-0456PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHUTICH, Justice.

Appellant Edward John LaPenotiere, Jr., was charged with second-degree sale of a controlled substance for selling heroin and Vicodin in a "school zone." Under Minnesota Statutes section 152.01, subdivision 14a(2) (2016), a "school zone" includes "the area surrounding school property ... to a distance of 300 feet or one city block, whichever distance is greater, beyond the *353school property." At trial, the State introduced a map and testimony demonstrating that the drug sale had occurred at LaPenotiere's home, which is located on a city block that is diagonal, or kitty-corner,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. State v. ThonesavanhSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  3. State of Minnesota v. Brandon Wayne RiggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  4. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  5. Butala v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State of Minnesota v. Brandon Stuart MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
  2. State v. GosewischCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
  3. State v. WilkieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API