State v. Jama
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
McKEIG, Justice.
Appellant Mohamed Musa Jama was convicted of gross-misdemeanor indecent exposure for conduct that occurred on a public sidewalk in the presence of children who were under the age of 16. On appeal, Jama contends that the indecent-exposure statute, Minn. Stat. § 617.23, subd. 2 (2018), requires the State to prove that he engaged in conduct with a specific intent to be lewd and, therefore, the court of appeals erred when it affirmed the district court's denial of his request for a jury instruction on the defense of voluntary intoxication. Because the indecent-exposure statute…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. FleckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. StevensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State of Minnesota v. Thomas Raymond StruzykSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- State of Minnesota v. David Lee HaywoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Houston v. International Data Transfer Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kelly D Jull and Heather S JullUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2025
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Eloisa Rubi Plancarte, AppellantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2025