State v. Rick
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILDEA, Chief Justice.
The State of Minnesota challenges a decision of the court of appeals reversing respondent Daniel James Rick’s conviction of attempted first-degree assault by communicable disease, in violation of Minn. Stat. § 609.2241 (2012). A jury found Rick guilty of attempted first-degree assault by transferring a communicable disease, in violation of MinmStat. § 609.2241, subd. 2(2), which applies to the “transfer of blood, sperm, organs, or tissue.” But the jury found Rick not guilty of violating Minn.Stat. § 609.2241, subd. 2(1), which applies to “sexual penetration ...…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Rewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Beecham v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- State v. ThonesavanhSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- State of Minnesota v. Brandon Wayne RiggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald DriggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Thomas Raymond StruzykSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Alice Ann Staab v. Diocese of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.