United States v. Gillenwater
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
CRAWFORD, Judge:
1. Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted by general court-martial members1 of wrongful appropriation and violation of a lawful general regulation by possessing drug paraphernalia, in violation of Article 121 and 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 921 and 892, respectively. The convening authority approved the sentence of a bad-conduct discharge and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. On May 26, 1994, the Court of Military Review2 affirmed the findings of guilty and the sentence.3 Unpub. op. at 4.
2. We granted review on the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1994
- United States v. TaylorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. GinnUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
- United States v. SteinruckUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
- United States v. GreavesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
- United States v. SchumacherCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2011
- United States v. BinegarCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
- United States v. NewArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
- United States v. RushArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.