Legal Opinion

United States v. Steinruck

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 10, 1981No. 38,932; CM 438660PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

FLETCHER, Judge:

Before a general court-martial composed of officers, the appellant at bar was convicted of heroin sale and sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, 5 years’ confinement at hard labor and total forfeiture of all pay and allowances. After approval and affirmance below of the court-martial’s findings and sentence, the appellant successfully obtained a grant (9 M.J. 179) of review of the following alleged errors:

A. (Granted Issue III)

THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED BY ADMITTING PROSECUTION EXHIBIT 3, RECORD OF PROCEEDING UNDER ARTICLE 15, UCMJ, WITHOUT A SHOWING THAT…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. GravesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. BookerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  3. United States v. MackUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  4. United States v. SalleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  5. United States v. MathewsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. United States v. TaylorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  2. United States v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  3. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  4. United States v. VanzandtUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  5. United States v. HibbardCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API