United States v. Steinruck
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Judge:
Before a general court-martial composed of officers, the appellant at bar was convicted of heroin sale and sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, 5 years’ confinement at hard labor and total forfeiture of all pay and allowances. After approval and affirmance below of the court-martial’s findings and sentence, the appellant successfully obtained a grant (9 M.J. 179) of review of the following alleged errors:
A. (Granted Issue III)
THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED BY ADMITTING PROSECUTION EXHIBIT 3, RECORD OF PROCEEDING UNDER ARTICLE 15, UCMJ, WITHOUT A SHOWING THAT…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. GravesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. BookerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. MackUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- United States v. SalleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- United States v. MathewsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- United States v. TaylorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
- United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
- United States v. VanzandtUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. HibbardCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.