Legal Opinion

United States v. Taylor

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided May 16, 1988No. 57,828; CM 449180PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

EVERETT, Chief Judge:

Notwithstanding Taylor’s not-guilty pleas, a general court-martial composed of officer members convicted him of rape and conspiracy to commit rape, in violation of Articles 120 and 81, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 920 and 881, respectively. Additionally, consistent with his pleas, he was convicted o| absence without leave (2 days), attempted escape from custody, escape from confinement, and wrongful communication of a threat — violations of Articles 86, 80, 95, and 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 886, 880, 895, and 934, respectively.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. SalleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  2. United States v. GinnUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  3. United States v. SteinruckUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  4. United States v. CarrUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  5. United States v. JacksonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. United States v. ManceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  2. United States v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  3. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
  4. United States v. HibbardCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  5. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API