Legal Opinion
United States v. Binegar
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided May 4, 2001No. 00-0207/AFPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge SULLIVAN
delivered the opinion of the Court.
In March of 1997, appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer members at Hanscom Ah’ Force Base in Massachusetts. Contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty of four specifications of stealing contact lenses which were military property of the United States, and one specification of conspiring to steal those contact lenses, in violation of Articles 121 and 81, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 921 and 881, respectively. On March 28, 1997, he was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, 3 months of hard labor without…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. RowanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. SicleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. WardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Specialist JOSHUA D. CHANDLERArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015
- United States v. Major CARL W. AXELSON, JR.Army Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
- United States v. SimpsonArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
- United States v. CraigUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2006
- United States v. BankstonArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.