Legal Opinion
United States v. New
Army Court of Criminal Appeals
Decided April 28, 1999No. ARMY 9600263PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
TOOMEY, Senior Judge:
Contrary to his pleas, appellant was found guilty by a panel of officers and enlisted soldiers, sitting as a special court-martial empowered to adjudge a bad-conduct discharge, of failure to obey a lawful order in violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 892 [hereinafter UCMJ]. The panel sentenced appellant to a bad-conduct discharge. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence.
This case is before the court for review pursuant to Article 66, UCMJ. Appellant asserts nine assignments of error.1 For the reasons…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. NewCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
- U.S. ex rel New, M. v. Rumsfeld, Donald H.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Ponder v. StoneNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
- United States Ex Rel. New v. RumsfeldDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- United States v. Specialist SABRINA D. HARMANArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.