Di Gildo v. Caponi
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchneider, J.
Appellant argues that infancy cannot vary a social host’s duty to his guests, and that the facts in this case show no violation of a landoccupier’s duty to his infant social guest, as a matter of law. We do not agree and, therefore, affirm.
*127Liability for negligence is predicated upon injury caused by the failure to discharge a duty owed to the injured party. Feldman v. Howard, 10 Ohio St. 2d 189; Grossnickle v. Germantown, 3 Ohio St. 2d 96, 103; Schell v. DuBois, 94 Ohio St. 93; 39 Ohio Jurisprudence 2d 482, Negligence, Section 2.
The amount of care required of a person to establish whether he…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Johnson v. Wagner Provision Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
- Neff Lumber Co. v. First National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1930
- Schell v. DuBoisOhio Supreme Court · 1916
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by115 opinions
- Menifee v. Ohio Welding Products, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
- Mussivand v. DavidOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Strother v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Simmers v. Bentley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
- Texler v. D.O. Summers Cleaners & Shirt Laundry Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.