Menifee v. Ohio Welding Products, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
The issue presented is whether summary judgment in favor of appellees was proper on the theories of negligence and strict tort liability. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the appellate court’s ruling.
The crux of appellant’s negligence argument is that it was foreseeable by appellees that the air supply system would be used by General Electric for breathing purposes. Appellant contends that due to the alleged *77foreseeable use of the system, a duty arose on the part of appellees to inquire of General Electric as to the system’s contemplated use. Thus, argues appellant, appellees would…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Leichtamer v. American Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
- Lonzrick v. Republic Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966
- Di Gildo v. CaponiOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- Gedeon v. East Ohio Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
- Mudrich v. Standard Oil Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,055 opinions
- Armstrong v. Best Buy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003
- Mussivand v. DavidOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Simmers v. Bentley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
- Texler v. D.O. Summers Cleaners & Shirt Laundry Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Jeffers v. OlexoOhio Supreme Court · 1989
1,050 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.