Legal Opinion

Simmers v. Bentley Construction Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1992No. 91-1500PublishedCited by 311 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerbert R. Brown, J.

The issue before us is whether the trial court properly granted summary judgment to Bentley. Bentley is an independent contractor who concedes for purposes of this appeal that it created a dangerous condition on the railroad bridge. Accordingly we must decide whether Bentley’s liability is determined by the rules governing landowner liability or by the ordinary rules of negligence. For the reasons that follow we find that the rules of negligence apply and that summary judgment was improper.

The trial court and the court of appeals determined that CSX, the owner of the bridge, owed no duty to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Menifee v. Ohio Welding Products, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Mussivand v. DavidOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Paschal v. Rite Aid Pharmacy, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Sidle v. HumphreyOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Jeffers v. OlexoOhio Supreme Court · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by311 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Best Buy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Lang v. Holly Hill Motel, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. McGuire v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Carnes v. SiferdOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Vanderbilt v. Pier 27, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013

306 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API