Legal Opinion

Mussivand v. David

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1989No. 88-1390PublishedCited by 529 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

This case comes to us on a dismissal of a complaint for failure to state a cause of action. The complaint basically states that appellee contracted a venereal disease due to the acts of the appellant. Therefore we do not know whether the venereal disease was gonorrhea, syphilis, genital herpes, venereal warts or some other sexually transmitted disease. Hence a brief discussion of sexually transmitted diseases is necessary.

A “venereal disease” is defined as “a contagious disease, most commonly acquired in sexual intercourse or other genital contact; the venereal diseases include syphilis,…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Menifee v. Ohio Welding Products, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Burr v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Weirum v. RKO General, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Gaines v. Preterm-Cleveland, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Strock v. PressnellOhio Supreme Court · 1988

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by529 opinions

  1. Simmers v. Bentley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Wallace v. Ohio Dept. of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Meany v. MeanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  4. Pacher v. Invisible Fence of DaytonOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. In re Sony Gaming Networks & Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014

524 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API