Legal Opinion

Strother v. Hutchinson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1981No. 80-1088PublishedCited by 498 opinions

1Per curiam

The primary issue presented in this case is whether the trial court properly directed a verdict in favor of defendants at the close of plaintiffs’ case in chief.

When considering a motion for a directed verdict, a trial court must construe the evidence most strongly in favor of the party against whom the motion is directed. Civ. R. 50(A)(4) provides that:

“When a motion for a directed verdict has been properly made, and the trial court, after construing the evidence most strongly in favor of the party against whom the motion is directed, finds that upon any determinative issue reasonable minds…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. IvyOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Johnson v. Wagner Provision Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Neff Lumber Co. v. First National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Di Gildo v. CaponiOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Gedeon v. East Ohio Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by498 opinions

  1. Kniskern v. Township of SomerfordOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Paugh v. HanksOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Texler v. D.O. Summers Cleaners & Shirt Laundry Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Jeffers v. OlexoOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Ramage v. Central Ohio Emergency Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992

493 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API