Legal Opinion
Neff Lumber Co. v. First National Bank
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 23, 1930No. 21918, 21919 and 21920PublishedCited by 121 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
As set forth in the petitions, and conceded by the demurrers, Andrew Dyken, at the time that the defendant by its agent sold him the shotgun and ammunition in question, was a minor under the age of sixteen years. The sale was hence unlawful.
Section 12966, General Code, provides:
“Whoever sells or exhibits for sale, to a minor under sixteen years of age, a pistol manufactured of a metallic or hard substance, commonly known as a ‘toy pistol’ or air gun, or any form of explosive gun, shall be fined not less than ten dollars nor more than fifty dollars or imprisoned not less than ten days nor more…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Schell v. DuBoisOhio Supreme Court · 1916
- Hartnett v. Boston StoreIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
- Mouse v. Central Savings & Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1929
- Anderson v. SettergrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by121 opinions
- Mussivand v. DavidOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Strother v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Paugh v. HanksOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Cascone v. Herb Kay Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- Di Gildo v. CaponiOhio Supreme Court · 1969
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.