Legal Opinion

Texler v. D.O. Summers Cleaners & Shirt Laundry Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1998No. 97-379PublishedCited by 253 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

The issue presented by this case is whether, on the facts of this case, the trial court should have decided upon a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict that as a matter of law the appellant contributed over fifty percent of the negligence involved in the accident and was therefore not entitled to judgment.

The standard for granting a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative for a new trial pursuant to Civ.R. 50(B) is the same as that for granting a motion for a directed verdict pursuant to Civ.R. 50(A). Wagner v. Roche Laboratories (1996), 77 Ohio St.3d…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Menifee v. Ohio Welding Products, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Strother v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Posin v. A. B. C. Motor Court Hotel, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Ruta v. Breckenridge-Remy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Gladon v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by253 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Best Buy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. City of Norwood v. HorneyOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Wallace v. Ohio Dept. of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Sikora v. WenzelOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Buchaklian v. Lake County Family Young Men's Christian Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000

248 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API