Los Angeles School Dist. v. Longden
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION to the Supreme Court for Writ of Mandate to compel the issuance of bonds of Los Angeles City School District by the Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This is an original application to this court for a writ of mandate growing out of the following facts: The Los Angeles City School District of Los Angeles County comprises for its territory the city of Los Angeles and certain contiguous outlying lands. Its governing body is the board of trustees of Los Angeles City School District of Los Angeles County, whose members are the same as those of the board of education of the city of Los Angeles. This board of trustees, in compliance with the provisions of section 1880 et seq. of the Political Code, initiated proceedings for the issuance of bonds…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kennedy v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Hancock v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Hughes v. EwingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Law v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- In re WetmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Board of Education of City of Ardmore v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Esberg v. BadaraccoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Whitmore v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Carlberg v. MetcalfeNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
- City of Aurora v. Aurora Sanitation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.