City of Aurora v. Aurora Sanitation District
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knous
Plaintiff in error, hereinafter to be referred to as the city, is a municipal corporation organized under the general statutes providing for the formation of towns and cities. Defendant in error, which we shall call the district, is a sanitation district incorporated under the provisions of chapter 175, S.L. 1939, as amended by chapter 232, S.L. 1941. The combined acts appear as chapter 173A, 1942 Supp. to ’35 C.S.A., and our reference to specific sections will follow the enumeration of the latter. To provide revenue for the installation and maintenance of sewage disposal facilities, these…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wilson v. Board of TrusteesIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- People Ex Rel. Rogers v. LetfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
- Milheim v. Moffat Tunnel Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
- In Re Sanitary Bd. of E. Fruitvale Sanitary Dist.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Perkins v. Board of County CommissionersIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Dwyer v. Omaha-Douglas Public Building CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
- City of Northglenn v. City of ThorntonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. City of LakewoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- War Memorial Hospital of District No. 1 v. Board of the County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1955
- Wagener v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.