In re Wetmore
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The legislature of this state at its session in 1889 passed an act, approved March 19, 1889, authorizing the incurring of indebtedness for municipal improvements, and issuing bonds therefor by cities, towns, and municipal incorporations (Stats. 1889, p. 399), the first section of which declares that “ Any city, town, or municipal corporation incorporated under the laws of this state, may, as hereafter provided, incur indebtedness to pay the cost of any municipal improvement, or for any purpose whatever requiring an expenditure greater than the amount allowed for such improvement by the annual…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kennedy v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Board of Education v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Bd. of Educ. of San Francisco v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Horton v. Mobile School CommissionersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1869
3Cited by16 opinions
- Board of Education of City of Ardmore v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Law v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Whitmore v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Carlberg v. MetcalfeNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
- City of Aurora v. Aurora Sanitation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.