Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. Miller

California Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1893No. 19032PublishedCited by 75 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The charter of the city of San Diego was framed by a board of freeholders chosen therefor, and, having been adopted by the electors of the city and approved by both houses of the legislature (Stats. 1889, p. 643), went into effect on the first Monday of May, 1889. Article 7 of the charter is entitled “Educational Department,” and provides for a hoard .of education with certain designated powers and duties. Section 6 of this article provides for a public school fund of the city, to consist of “all moneys received from the city, county, and state school funds, of all moneys arising from taxes…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hughes v. EwingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Estate of BulmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Hall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Butt v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Civic Center Ass'n of Los Angeles v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Hancock v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API