Witzke v. Mesabi Rehabilitation Services, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
In this appeal from summary judgment granted by a judicial officer, appellant argues that the judicial officer did not have subject-matter jurisdiction to hear and decide the case on a motion for summary judgment. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Appellant Mesabi Rehabilitation Services, Inc. (Mesabi) provides vocational-rehabilitation services to injured persons. Shortly after he founded Mesabi in 1988, Jim Jackson offered respondent John Witzke a position with Mesabi. Approximately eight months later, Jackson presented Witzke with an employment agreement under which Witzke…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Tischer v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of CambridgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Mercer v. AndersenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Herubin v. FinnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Life Time Fitness, Inc. v. DeCellesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- Linert v. MacDonaldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Centra Homes, LLC v. City of Norwood Young AmericaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Waxing the City Franchisor LLC v. KatularuDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024