Legal Opinion

Witzke v. Mesabi Rehabilitation Services, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 14, 2009No. A08-1011PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

In this appeal from summary judgment granted by a judicial officer, appellant argues that the judicial officer did not have subject-matter jurisdiction to hear and decide the case on a motion for summary judgment. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Appellant Mesabi Rehabilitation Services, Inc. (Mesabi) provides vocational-rehabilitation services to injured persons. Shortly after he founded Mesabi in 1988, Jim Jackson offered respondent John Witzke a position with Mesabi. Approximately eight months later, Jackson presented Witzke with an employment agreement under which Witzke…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. Tischer v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of CambridgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  3. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  4. Mercer v. AndersenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  5. Herubin v. FinnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Life Time Fitness, Inc. v. DeCellesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
  2. Linert v. MacDonaldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  3. Centra Homes, LLC v. City of Norwood Young AmericaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  4. Waxing the City Franchisor LLC v. KatularuDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API