Legal Opinion
Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 1, 2002No. C4-01-632, C6-01-227PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRINGER, Justice.
Jeffrey A.Z. Hilligoss (respondent), a former employee of appellant Cargill Financial Services Corporation (CFSC), 1 was terminated in September 1997 based on Cargill’s determination that he was responsible for significant investment losses to the company and that he failed to meet performance expectations. Respondent sued Cargill seeking, among other things, the unpaid portion of his 1996 deferred bonus payment which Cargill claimed was forfeited because respondent was terminated for cause. Following a six-day trial, a jury found that Cargill did not have cause to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Turner v. Alpha Phi Sorority HouseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Alholm v. WiltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Current Technology Concepts, Inc. v. Irie Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Lindstrom v. Yellow Taxi Company of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Davies & Davies Agency, Inc. v. DaviesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Domagala v. RollandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Alpha Real Estate Co. of Rochester v. Delta Dental Plan of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Staffing Specifix, Inc. v. Tempworks Mgmt. Servs., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- Ram Mutual Insurance Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Duxbury v. Spex Feeds, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.