Herubin v. Finn
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
Appellants David Finn and David Bergstedt challenge the district court’s determination that respondent Jack Puglisi is entitled to contribution for a judgment satisfied by respondent but entered against appellants and respondent jointly and severally. We hold that respondent failed to comply with Minn.Stat. § 548.19 (1998), and that respondent’s filing of a satisfaction of judgment divested the district court of its subject matter jurisdiction over the judgment. Because the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to entertain respondent’s motion for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Boutin v. LaFleurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Gustafson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Dorso Trailer Sales, Inc. v. American Body & Trailer, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Metge v. Central Neighborhood Improvement Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America v. Saint-Gobain Technical Fabrics Canada Ltd.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
- Abd Alla v. MourssiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Witzke v. Mesabi Rehabilitation Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- City of Granite Falls v. Soo Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.