Legal Opinion
Linert v. MacDonald
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 11, 2017No. A17-0127PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BJORKMAN, Judge
Relator challenges an order issued by the Minnesota Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) determining that she violated Minn. Stat. § 211B.02, arguing OAH lacked jurisdiction and that the statute is unconstitutionally overbroad. We affirm.
FACTS
In 2016, relator Michelle MacDonald was a candidate for the Minnesota Supreme Court. During her campaign, she sought the endorsement of the Republican Party of Minnesota (the RPM), which had endorsed her during her unsuccessful 2014 campaign. Prior to the RPM’s 2016 state convention, MacDonald was interviewed by the party’s…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- McIntyre v. Ohio Elections CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Dunham v. RoerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lewison v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
- Minnesota RFL Republican Farmer Labor Caucus v. FreemanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
- Minnesota RFL Republican Farmer Labor Caucus v. FreemanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020