Douglas v. Pension Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
Subsequent to the institution of this proceeding the petitioner passed out of life, and William Douglas, the duly appointed administrator of his estate, by stipulation of the respective counsel, has been substituted for and in the place of the deceased as petitioner herein.
The proceeding involves an original application for a writ of mandate to compel the respondents, the Pension Board, and the members thereof, of the city of Sacramento, to allow and grant to petitioner an annual pension of $646.34 as a retired employee of said city by virtue of certain provisions of the charter thereof. By…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Haberlan v. LoveNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
- People ex rel. Kroner v. AbbottIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
- Whitehead v. DavieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Hammitt v. GaynorNew York Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by23 opinions
- Klench v. Board of Pension Fund CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Sweesy v. Los Angeles County Peace Officers' Retirement BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Groat v. Walkup Drayage & Warehouse Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Gibson v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- MacIntyre v. Retirement Board of SFCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.