State ex rel. Haberlan v. Love
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal.from the district court for Lancaster county: Albert J. Cornish, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.
This is a mandamus proceeding to compel the officers of the city of Lincoln “to place plaintiff upon the retired lisft of firemen in said city and pay him a pension of $50 a month, and that said pension he dated from April 1, 1904.” No alternative writ was issued, but the respondents filed a general demurrer, which was sustained by the district court, and the relator’s application was dismissed. The relator appeals.
In 1895, the legislature, by chapter 39, laws 1895, provided : “That all metropolitan cities and cities of the first *151class having a paid fire department, shall pension all firemen…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Trustees of Exempt Firemen's Benevolent Fund v. RoomeNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Phœnix Assurance Co. v. Fire DepartmentSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- Mead v. Inhabitants of ActonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
- Lincoln Street Railway Co. v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
- State ex rel. Attorney General v. MooresNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Byrd v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1928
- Retirement Board v. McGovernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Yeazell v. CopinsArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- O'Dea v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Klench v. Board of Pension Fund CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.