Legal Opinion
Sweesy v. Los Angeles County Peace Officers' Retirement Board
California Supreme Court
Decided February 17, 1941No. L. A. 17579PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
Mary Estelle Sweesy filed in the Superior Court in Los Angeles County a petition for a writ of mandate praying that the respondents be directed to order the payment to her of certain monthly instalments under the 1937 amendment to the County Peace Officers’ Retirement Act (Stats. 1937, p. 664). The trial court sustained a demurrer to the petition without leave to amend. The petitioner appealed from the judgment of dismissal which followed the court’s order.
The Los Angeles County Peace Officers’ Retirement Board exists pursuant to an act entitled, “An Act to Authorize the Counties of the State…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- O'Dea v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Klench v. Board of Pension Fund CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Aitken v. RocheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- People Ex Rel. Albright v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
- Kavanagh v. Board of Police Pension Fund CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- In Re Marriage of FithianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Benson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Waite v. WaiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.