Legal Opinion

Klench v. Board of Pension Fund Commissioners

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 17, 1926No. Docket No. 3108PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The court below granted a peremptory writ of mandate to compel the appellants, as members of the Pension Board of the City of Stockton and the City Auditor, as such, to allow, audit, and pay petitioner certain sums of money alleged to be due him from said city as for a pension as a duly retired member of the police department of said City of Stockton, holding at the time of such retirement the rank of patrolman. The appeal is by appellants from the judgment entered upon an order overruling a demurrer to the petition. The following brief general statement of the facts is taken from the opening…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Pennie v. ReisSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Hanscom v. Malden & Melrose Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. O'Dea v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. United States v. TellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. Civic Center Ass'n of Los Angeles v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Butterworth v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Waite v. WaiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Roddy v. ValentineNew York Court of Appeals · 1935

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API