Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

MacIntyre v. Retirement Board of SF

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 3, 1941No. Civ. 11394PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

An appeal by petitioners from a judgment denying their application for a writ of mandate to compel the Retirement Board of the City and County of San Francisco to permit their retirement on pension as lieutenants of the police department.

At the time of filing the application, each officer had reached the retirement age, with sufficient years of service to his credit, and had made all necessary contributions to the retirement system pension fund. Three days after the application of MacIntyre, and thirteen days prior to that of Mignola, to be retired from active service, a verified complaint…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. O'Dea v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Kavanagh v. Board of Police Pension Fund CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Douglas v. Pension BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. People ex rel. Hardy v. GreeneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  5. People ex rel. Hardy v. GreeneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Fox v. Board of Trustees of the Policemen's Pension or Relief FundWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Driggs v. Utah Teachers Retirement BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Lawrence v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Skaggs v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Haywood v. American River Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API