Legal Opinion

Jewell v. Price

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 1, 1963No. 250PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Plaintiffs’ motion to strike is addressed to each further answer and defense in its entirety and in substance, if not in .form, is a demurrer to each further answer and defense. The court, in allowing plaintiffs’ motion to strike, in effect sustained a demurrer to each of defendant’s further defenses. Hence, Rule 4(a); Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 254 N.C. 783, 785, does not apply. Jenkins & Co. v. Lewis, 259 N.C. 85, 87, 130 S.E. 2d 49; Williams v. Hunter, 257 N.C. 754, 127 S.E. 2d 546; Mercer v. Hilliard, 249 N.C. 725, 107 S.E. 2d 554, and eases cited.

“A demurrer or motion to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hinson v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Burgess v. TrevathanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Penn Dixie Lines, Inc. v. GrannickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Milwaukee Insurance Co. v. McLean Trucking Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. J. A. Jones Construction Co. v. Local Union 755 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. J & B Slurry Seal Co. v. Mid-South Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Shope v. BoyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Guilford Realty & Insurance Co. v. Blythe Bros. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Parnell v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API