Shope v. Boyer
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
The demurrer challenges the complaint as fatally defective in factual averments. These defects appear upon its face. Attached to and made a part of plaintiff’s basic pleading is a copy of the contract between A. P. Central as seller, and each corporate defendant as customer. The plaintiff alleges the defendants conspired to violate the attached contract. The contract provides:
“WHEREAS, Customer desires from time to time to purchase some of its requirements of such parts and other articles as are warehoused and sold by the Seller and Customer agrees to maintain on deposit with the Seller the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Reid v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Muse v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Holt v. HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Manufacturing Co. v. . ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Kirby v. . ReynoldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Krawiec v. ManlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
- Toomer v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Henry v. DeenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Cameron v. New Hanover Memorial Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.